-
Die View sieht so aus:
CREATE VIEW PPGIDPV
(RSPD00, RSPF00, IITM00, JDSC00, QPR100, QPR200,
EANR00, IBON00, OABC00, OCOA00, IACG00, USPL00,
WCST00, PSTY00, STVL00, SUPO00, COSS00,
PRDT1N, ITTY1N,
PLNU1N, PLNG1N, PURU1N, BYGG1N, FXSU1N, OPRP1N, DISP1N,
OQUI1N, LOTI1N, IDRE1N, SRQF1N, BTFL1N, SPTT1N, PRCI1N,
QCFW1N, HDSP1N, CRPF1N, PRCP1N, GICP1N, STQF1N, STQE1N,
RTGN1N, RTSS1N,
ITMS1I,
TXT11G, TXT21G, TXT31G)
AS SELECT
RSPD00, RSPF00, IITM00, JDSC00, QPR100, QPR200,
EANR00, IBON00, OABC00, OCOA00, IACG00, USPL00,
WCST00, PSTY00, STVL00, SUPO00, COSS00,
PRDT1N, ITTY1N,
PLNU1N, PLNG1N, PURU1N, BYGG1N, FXSU1N, OPRP1N, DISP1N,
OQUI1N, LOTI1N, IDRE1N, SRQF1N, BTFL1N, SPTT1N, PRCI1N,
QCFW1N, HDSP1N, CRPF1N, PRCP1N, GICP1N, STQF1N, STQE1N,
RTGN1N, RTSS1N,
ITMS1I,
cast(
(case when t1.TEXT1G is null then ' ' else t1.text1g end)
as char(50)) as text1,
cast(
(case when t2.TEXT1G is null then ' ' else t2.text1g end)
as char(50)) as text2,
cast(
(case when t3.TEXT1G is null then ' ' else t3.text1g end)
as char(50)) as text3
FROM GIDPF300
LEFT OUTER JOIN GIDPF01N ON
ITNR1N = IITM00 AND
LGNT1N||SCPB1N = 'ATAT'
LEFT OUTER JOIN GIDPF01I ON
ITNR1I = IITM00 AND
LGNT1I||SCPB1I||CMPN1I = '000000'
LEFT OUTER JOIN GIDPF01g as t1 ON
t1.ITNR1G = IITM00 AND
t1.ITNR1G = IITM00 AND
t1.LGNT1G||t1.SCPB1G||t1.CMPN1G = '000000' AND
t1.TXTY1G = ' ' and t1.TXTP1G = 'IDS' and t1.LNGG1G = 'DE' AND
t1.posn1G = '0010'
LEFT OUTER JOIN GIDPF01g as t2 ON
t2.ITNR1G = IITM00 AND
t2.LGNT1G||t2.SCPB1G||t2.CMPN1G = '000000' AND
t2.TXTY1G = ' ' and t2.TXTP1G = 'IDS' and t2.LNGG1G = 'DE' AND
t2.posn1G = '0020'
LEFT OUTER JOIN GIDPF01g as t3 ON
t3.ITNR1G = IITM00 AND
t3.LGNT1G||t3.SCPB1G||t3.CMPN1G = '000000' AND
t3.TXTY1G = ' ' and t3.TXTP1G = 'IDS' and t3.LNGG1G = 'DE' AND
t3.posn1G = '0030'
Satzanzahl
GIDPF300 - 1,8 Millionen
GIDPF01N - 450.000
GIDPF01I - 320.000
GIDPF01G - 2,1 Millionen
Wenn jemand eine Idee hat, wie man optimieren kann - her damit.
Das einzige was im SQL "fix" ist, ist am Ende ORDER BY (aber auch wieder abhängig von der Eingabe: upper(JDSC00) oder IITM00) und neu "optimize for 20 rows".
Similar Threads
-
By christian_lettner in forum NEWSboard Programmierung
Antworten: 2
Letzter Beitrag: 16-11-06, 10:15
-
By mariupol1963 in forum IBM i Hauptforum
Antworten: 9
Letzter Beitrag: 11-08-06, 13:06
-
By loeweadolf in forum NEWSboard Programmierung
Antworten: 2
Letzter Beitrag: 01-06-06, 09:43
-
By pwrdwnsys in forum IBM i Hauptforum
Antworten: 10
Letzter Beitrag: 16-08-05, 08:56
-
By itec01 in forum IBM i Hauptforum
Antworten: 9
Letzter Beitrag: 16-09-04, 18:38
Berechtigungen
- Neue Themen erstellen: Nein
- Themen beantworten: Nein
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Foren-Regeln
|
Erweiterte Foren Suche
Google Foren Suche
Forum & Artikel Update eMail
AS/400 / IBM i
Server Expert Gruppen
Unternehmens IT
|
Kategorien online Artikel
- Big Data, Analytics, BI, MIS
- Cloud, Social Media, Devices
- DMS, Archivierung, Druck
- ERP + Add-ons, Business Software
- Hochverfügbarkeit
- Human Resources, Personal
- IBM Announcements
- IT-Karikaturen
- Leitartikel
- Load`n`go
- Messen, Veranstaltungen
- NEWSolutions Dossiers
- Programmierung
- Security
- Software Development + Change Mgmt.
- Solutions & Provider
- Speicher – Storage
- Strategische Berichte
- Systemmanagement
- Tools, Hot-Tips
Auf dem Laufenden bleiben
|
Bookmarks